61ª Venice Biennale

The Venice Biennale 2026 confirms something very Artlovers: art is no longer something we observe silently from outside the world; it happens inside its conflicts.

This edition asks whether museums, pavilions, and biennales can still speak about beauty when the world around them is marked by war, censorship, vulnerable bodies, ecological crisis, and propaganda.

Perhaps that is why In Minor Keys works so well as a title: this is not a Biennale of grand certainties, but one of discomfort, political noise, and small signals.

A Biennale that is not only visited — it is discussed.

The most controversial exhibitions / performances

1. Austria — Florentina Holzinger, Seaworld Venice

• Probably the most viral and scandalous performance of this edition. It includes nudity, jet skis, suspended bodies, tanks filled with water filtered from urine, and a mix of circus, ritual, ecological critique, and bodily feminism.
• It is provocative, but not empty provocation: it speaks about sustainability, female bodies, invisible labor, and the relationship between water, waste, and spectacle.

2. Russia — the return of the Russian Pavilion

• The controversy here is not so much about the artwork itself, but about the institutional gesture: allowing Russia to return to the Biennale after years of absence due to the war in Ukraine.
• The pavilion was closed to the general public, although it was visible during the preview days. It became a symbol of one of the central questions of this Biennale: can art remain neutral when the world is at war?

3. Israel — a presence under protest

• The Israeli Pavilion also became a focus of protests and debates about whether an artist can represent a State in a context of war.

Some voices defended artistic freedom; others argued that national representation cannot be separated from politics.

4. United States — Alma Allen, Call Me the Breeze

• The work itself — biomorphic sculptures in wood, stone, and bronze — appears formally calm. The controversy came from the process: institutional changes, criteria linked to “American values,” and criticism over whether the pavilion reflected a cultural agenda.

It is an interesting case because it shows that, in Venice, even an “apolitical” artwork can become political.

5. Eccentric pavilions: Denmark, Luxembourg, Japan, Malta

• Among the most talked-about proposals are almost absurd or surreal projects: Denmark with a kind of high-tech sperm bank, Luxembourg with a singing “turd,” Japan with fake babies that visitors must take care of, and Malta with a life-size chocolate Russell Crowe.
• More than political scandal, the controversy here is aesthetic: is this deep art, viral spectacle, or a contemporary theme park?